As I’m rejoining the poker world, I’ve been posting over on 2+2 to try and get my mind back into the poker grove. Since I’m playing NL10 I’m posting on the micro forum, which is probably good because mostly it’s just simple concepts and plays (where I need to be focusing right now). My impression of the posts is that people generally overestimate and overthink plays at that level- usually make a hand->bet, bet, bet wins the money.
At any rate, one post in general really frustrated me- I questioned a PF call in a hand (and I still think it’s a losing play), and rather than listen to what I had to say and evaluate it, he called me a “nit” and tried to educate me on the concept of “implied odds”. Anyway, due to the “I have to argue until people admit I’m right” personality trait that my wife just loves, I tried to explain over and over even when it was clear the poster wasn’t going to see my point. I did finally give up, but only after explaining spr and haiving a plan for your hand 3 or 4 different ways. I think what’s really frustrating is to see a player come to a poker forum and post a hand with the apparent desire to learn to improve at poker, but then refuse to listen or try to understand logic that might improve his game. It was easier to call me a nit than to think about the arguments I brought up. I suppose I should be happy there are players out there like this, as they are always going to be donaters in any kind of challenging game, but I just hate trying to help and have people ignore it. At any rate, it’s a good reminder for to make sure I’m always open and willing to learn.
So this brings me to the point: I think the most important poker skill having a reasonable estimation of your ability- that is, the reason people lose at poker is that they think they are better than they are- any loses are chalked up to “bad luck” and they never improve. This is true from the casual player who never tries to learn the game to the poster on 2+2 who argues with every suggestion and calls anyone who disagrees names. The most I’ve learned about poker has been open discussions with my peers (like threads13), free from groupthink where we push each others’ ideas about poker. Sometimes we’d agree to disagree, but we always profited from being willing to question each other and our own plays. I’ve never been an awesome poker player, and I’m pretty sure I’ll never have the skill that the truly great players have, but I’ve been able to beat some pretty tough games just because I’m not willing to be satisfied with my game- I’m always look for ways to improve. And this is a trait I see in all of the best players.
Anyway, I know as I’m coming back to the game that there are some big leaks- I have to try and remember what I saw from this player and make sure I don’t do it myself. I need to be open to criticism and learning concepts that may challenge my ideas of existing concepts. Poker is a complicated game and there are always adjustments to be made- if I’m not continuously tweaking I won’t be ready when I finally get up into the tough games, and believe me, I am to be ready!